New Data Confirms That Natural Disaster Costs Are NOT Proof Of Global Warming
Natural disasters did $330 billion worth of damage in 2017, mostly due to hurricanes smashing into the U.S. this fall, making last year the second costliest year for disasters since 2011, according to the reinsurance industry.
Insurers will pay out $135 billion for natural disasters, according to Munich Re, the most on record. Most of the monetary damages came from hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria, which hit U.S. and Caribbean islands in the fall. Hurricanes did $215 billion in damage.
While nominal costs of natural disasters including hurricanes, fires and earthquakes has grown over time, taking into account inflation and economic growth actually shows disaster costs have been trending down since 1990.
That?s according to research by the University of Colorado?s Dr. Roger Pielke, Jr., who?s spent years studying why natural disaster spending has increased despite no apparent trends in extreme weather.
Pielke?s pushed back against claims made by politicians and activists that global warming is making natural disasters more frequent, thus pushing up disaster costs. Pielke?s work and the work of others however, shows this is not the case.
The global economy has grown since the 1990s. Hurricane Harvey, for example, was the costliest natural disaster of 2017, inflicting $85 billion when it struck in late August. Harvey dumped record rainfall for several days over the greater Houston area.
But Harvey?s price tag would have been much smaller had it hit in, say, 1960 when Houston?s population was 60 percent less than it is today. Fewer buildings, roads and infrastructure mean the same storm can do less damage.
For more info ... please click the ( The Daily Caller ) previous Hat/Tip link.